The Universities Fund has responded to growing concerns on the fate of funding to institutions of higher learning.
The funding model grounded to a halt following a court order issued by Justice E.C. Mwita on October 3, 2024, stopping its implementation, thus leaving students uncertain about the payment of fees.
University Fund in a statement on Thursday acknowledged the uncertainty caused by the ruling but assured stakeholders that they are working closely with the Ministry of Education to explore all legal avenues for a solution.
“We understand this situation may create uncertainty,” the Fund stated in a notice issued to stakeholders.
“We want to reassure you that we are actively working with the Ministry of Education to explore all legal avenues for an amicable and constructive resolution.”
The court order, which affected the rollout of the funding model, has sparked concern among students and educational institutions alike.
However, the Universities Fund emphasized its unwavering commitment to ensuring students continue to receive financial support despite the legal challenge.
“Our commitment to providing scholarships remains strong,” the notice continued, affirming the Fund’s dedication to maintaining stability for students.
The organization underscored the importance of clear and open communication with all stakeholders during this period of uncertainty.
The new funding model, which the government introduced earlier in 2024, aims to transform how students in public universities receive financial aid by offering scholarships and loans based on need.
Its implementation has been seen as a critical step toward ensuring fair access to higher education, particularly for students from low-income backgrounds.
However, its implementation has faced significant challenges, prompting legal scrutiny and debate.
Three organisations challenged it, claiming that it is unlawful and has caused confusion in higher education institutions.
They argued in their petition that the model was imposed abruptly, without consultation or supporting law.
They claimed that the Higher Education Loans Board and the Universities Fund were already legally required to manage higher education funding and adhere to the Maximum Differentiated Unit Cost Model, which was created in the Universities Act.