logo
ADVERTISEMENT

UoN dismisses claims of take over by individual with vested interests

UASU alleged that the institution is facing serious issues that need to be addressed with immediate effect

image
by PERPETUA ETYANG

News19 February 2025 - 18:27
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • UASU alleged that the UoN is facing serious issues that need to be addressed with immediate effect.
  • However, in a statement released shortly after the presser, UoN dismissed the allegations, saying the organs of the University are properly constituted and continue to fulfil their mandates in accordance with the provisions of the Universities Act, 2012, the University Charter, 2013.

The University of Nairobi/FILE

The University of Nairobi has dismissed allegations that the institution has been overtaken by individuals with vested interests.

UoN said the organs of the university are properly constituted and continue to fulfill their mandates in accordance with the provisions of the Universities Act, 2012, and the University Charter, 2013.

“Contrary to the baseless allegations made, decisions and measures are made invariably at different levels as the law and procedures stipulated,” the statement reads.

“The respective roles of the Chancellor, the Council, and the Vice Chancellor are distinct and clearly defined in law and the Charter as outlined in the Universities Act, Section 12, sub-sections 3(c) and 3(d), the Chancellor is entitled to advise the Council as needed for the betterment of the University and is entitled to certain powers and privileges as prescribed by the Charter.”

The University Academic Staff Union (UASU) had earlier demanded the removal of the University of Nairobi Council.

UASU alleged that the institution is facing serious issues that need to be addressed with immediate effect.

While addressing the press on Wednesday, UASU called on the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission to intervene.

“Now we have three centres of power at the University of Nairobi. It is confusing, and they are weakening the management of the University. We call upon the Education Ministry to take quick action because we are not ready to watch our University die in our eyes, he must take action,” a UASU member said.

“He should send the Council home immediately.”

UASU alleged that the institution has been taken over by individuals with vested interests.

“The University of Nairobi, as we know it, is dying. This is not meant to create panic but rather stems from our concern as UASU.”

However, the university stated that public universities across the country are facing significant financial constraints, the University of Nairobi notwithstanding.

They acknowledged that the university is currently navigating unprecedented financial challenges that demand urgent and decisive action.

“Recognising this urgent challenge, the Cabinet has approved a 24-month transformation agenda to be executed by the University Council, under the Chancellor’s guidance,” the statement read.

UoN said the initiative aims to restore financial stability and lay the foundation for long-term sustainability.

The agenda, they said, includes reforming academic programs, enhancing productivity, and diversifying revenue streams, including but not limited to the commercialisation of idle assets.

“Prior to this, continuous consultations have been ongoing, involving engagements with various stakeholders, including staff, students, and industry partners. These discussions were preceded by the launch of the ‘Big 5’ transformation agenda, emphasizing the University’s commitment to inclusive decision-making,” the statement reads in part.

“Stakeholder input remains a continuous exercise, and to further enhance participation, a town hall meeting has been scheduled to gather additional insights and ensure the effective implementation of this transformative agenda.”

UoN said the threats issued are diversionary tactics intended to impede the transformation agenda of the university.

The University called on UASU to allow investigations to proceed without obstruction and to let the law take its cause, including the intervention by relevant investigative agencies of government.

“We wish to clarify that the Chancellor serves in a pro bono capacity and does not receive any salary or benefits from the University. He is a full-time CEO, and his housing arrangements are independently provided for. His entitlement to security is aligned with that of the Vice Chancellor and other University officers,” the University stated.

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

logo© The Star 2024. All rights reserved