Supreme Court judges reprimand advocate for ‘bad’ etiquette

"You were seen scrolling on your phone as you lay in your bed. Behave like an advocate," the Judge said

In Summary
  • Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu reminded advocates that respect begets respect, and if one cannot respect the court, then they don't deserve an opportunity to appear before it.
The Supreme Court of Kenya.
The Supreme Court of Kenya.
Image: FILE

Supreme Court judges have today censured an advocate who appeared before them during the hearing of the 2023 Finance Act appeal.

The issue was addressed by Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu after parties concluded highlighting their submissions in the appeal.

Mwilu singled out the advocate whose conduct came under severe censure from the bench.

"You were seen scrolling on your phone as you lay in your bed. At Kenya School of Law, we were told something about professional ethics and etiquette. Behave like an advocate," the Judge said.

The DCJ reminded advocates that respect begets respect, and if one cannot respect the court, then they don't deserve an opportunity to appear before it.

"If you see the advocate, tell him next time he is in court, whether appearing as counsel or as an observer, he will be expected to dress appropriately and give respect to the court," Mwilu said.

The DCJ said his conduct sends a bad feeling that either advocates don't respect themselves or it's institutions.

In closing, Mwilu gave Prof Githu Muigai a moment to speak on the issue as the senior most counsel.

"We apologise unreservedly for that conduct. I will ensure that the issue will be brought to the attention of the chairperson of LSK," he said.

The unfortunate slip became a cautionary tale, reminding advocates about the importance of maintaining professional decorum even in the digital age.

WATCH: The latest videos from the Star