logo
ADVERTISEMENT

MP: Why livestock vaccination is a bad idea

Wamuchomba said the move could potentially affect animals' productivity and reproductivity.

image
by EMMANUEL WANJALA

Realtime28 November 2024 - 16:10
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • President William announced that come January, the government will embark on a nationwide livestock vaccination programme.
  • He said the goal is to vaccinate 22 million cattle and 50 million goats and sheep against diseases 

Githunguri MP Gathoni Wamuchomba

Githunguri MP Gathoni Wamuchomba has opposed the planned mass vaccination of livestock terming it a globalist ideology that will have negative effects on Kenya’s livestock reproductivity.

President William announced that come January, the government will embark on a nationwide livestock vaccination programme against diseases targeting 22 million cattle and 50 million goats and sheep.

Speaking on November 8 during the Maa Cultural Festival in Samburu, Ruto explained that the programme would help prevent animal diseases and thus secure the international market for livestock products.

“This will ensure we access both national and international markets for our livestock products,” he said.

But Wamuchomba differed with the President's sentiments, saying the vaccination is a foreign climate change mitigation idea to cut methane emissions by the animals through genetic modification.

Listening to the President, it's clear that the intention is a climate change move that’s supposed to help us reduce the release of methane into the air,” she said.

In a video statement on her X feed, Wamuchomba said there's still no clear explanation of the potential effects of the vaccines on animals’ productivity and reproductivity.

The legislator said it would have been best for the government to first hold public participation before embarking on the nationwide vaccination exercise.

“We have had these animals for centuries as part of our livelihoods, it is important for the President of Kenya before pronouncing such kind of plans to engage the people of Kenya very heavily because they are the real stakeholders.”

Wamuchomba said livestock farmers have not been given a clear explanation of the full implications of the vaccination other than being told it’s a disease prevention measure.

“Those behind this plan claim that the animal's natural release of intestinal gas into the atmosphere as a means of release from normal feeding and flatulence process is a hazardous process to the environment. This is not something to be taken lightly,” she said.

“This is a globalist idea, an idea that comes with a lot of negative impact. As a representative of a constituency where people I represent are livestock farmers, I reject this experimental programme in totality.” 

Wamuchomba urged fellow MPs to reject the vaccination plan saying that other than the negative effects she has highlighted, there’s the cost implication.

She said Parliament has not received any request to approve a budget for the vaccination, implying that the cost may be pushed to the farmers.

“Now that the President wants to vaccinate 22 million cows, does he have a budget? Are the farmers going to pay for this vaccination?  If as a country we are going to spend money for this vaccination, has he come to Parliament for budgeting?

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

logo© The Star 2024. All rights reserved