In recent discussions on revenue distribution in Kenya, the one man, one vote, one shilling formula has emerged as a divisive proposal. This approach, which advocates revenue allocation based solely on population size, ostensibly aims to ensure fairness.
However, a closer scrutiny reveals it as an insidious strategy driven by selfish interests and ulterior motives. Firstly, this formula is fundamentally exclusionary.
By prioritising populous regions, it marginalises less populated areas, perpetuating historical injustices and discrimination.
Successive governments have consistently overlooked these regions, and adopting this formula would only exacerbate their neglect.
It is imperative to recognise that all Kenyans, irrespective of their domicile, deserve equal rights and access to national resources. Geographic location should not determine one’s entitlement to the nation's wealth.
The proponents of this formula predominantly originate from populous communities. These communities control over 10 counties, forming a homogeneous bloc that stands to benefit disproportionately from this revenue model.
This creates a scenario where national resources are unfairly concentrated in specific regions, to the detriment of others. Such a model serves as a façade for resource grabbing, furthering the interests of a select few at the expense of many. Economic growth in Kenya is not driven solely by population numbers. The nation's wealth is significantly derived from natural resources, such as minerals, energy, water sources and fossil fuels.
These resources are predominantly located in sparsely populated regions. It is, therefore, illogical and unjust to distribute revenue based on population size when the economic contributions of less populated areas are substantial.
To foster equitable development, Kenya must adopt an inclusive approach that addresses the unique needs of its diverse regions. This strategy should aim to rectify historical injustices and ensure that all areas, regardless of population density, receive adequate resources for development.
Only through such an approach can we achieve true equity and national cohesion. The one man, one vote, one shilling formula is a deceptive and dangerous tactic employed by politicians with hidden agendas. It risks dividing the nation into ethnically defined economic zones, undermining national unity and stability.
This strategy must be resisted and opposed at all costs to safeguard the future of all Kenyans. In conclusion, the fair distribution of resources should not be dictated by population size but by a comprehensive understanding of each region's contributions and needs.
An inclusive development plan is the only path to a just and prosperous Kenya, where every citizen, regardless of their location, can thrive. It is time to move beyond divisive strategies and work towards a unified and equitable nation.