logo

WYCLIFFE MUGA: Why government projects fail

It is not just the usual accusation of corruption coming in to ruin well-intentioned projects

image
by BOSCO MARITA

Star-blogs03 October 2024 - 11:24

In Summary



 


By Wycliffe Muga

One of the criticisms often levelled against the current government, is that many of its most ambitious projects end up in failure.

An example of a conspicuous failure is the project for the upgrading of the various stadiums that are supposed to host major continental football matches not too long from now, but which are nowhere near ready.

However, such failures are not unique to the current administration. Our history shows that in Kenya it is very often the case that outside of the private sector, large projects often fall far short of expectation and have done so through virtually all administrations since Independence.

And the reason for this is not just the usual accusation of corruption coming in to ruin well-intentioned projects. Rather it is that our leaders often start on projects that are designed to be presented as the fulfilling of election promises, and to impress voters, rather than bring about measurable improvements in the lives of ordinary people.

Consider, for example, public health infrastructure, which is the indispensable pillar for the provision of Universal Health Care.

The moment that the 2010 constitution devolved health services to the counties, just about every governor set out to build a huge and prestigious “level-5” referral hospital. And the Uhuru Kenyatta government (2013 to 2022) went along with this and delivered some very advanced specialised medical equipment to be leased out to the county governments (whether the governors wanted this equipment or not).

Not only did it turn out that in most counties nobody had been trained to use this equipment, but where the large new hospitals were built, there were many empty rooms which initially only served as storage spaces for this unutilised fancy equipment.

And yet there is data easily available explaining what kind of policies have worked best, in developing countries which have achieved notable success in their public health systems with limited funds (Cuba, Thailand, Costa Rica, Sri Lanka). The emphasis in such countries has never been on large prestige projects in the form of brand-new multi-storey buildings, but rather on preventive care; community-based health programmes; control of infectious diseases; and effective vaccination programmes.

So, at a superficial level, it might seem as though building a huge new hospital is an important step towards providing healthcare services in our mostly rural counties. But on close examination, you realise that it is nothing of that kind and may even be dismissed as a wasteful public relations gesture rather than effective public health policy.

I could also mention that in the early days of the Standard Gauge Railway, from Mombasa to Nairobi, we witnessed the remarkable spectacle of those whom that railway was supposed to serve – importers and exporters who dealt in vast quantities of various goods – finding the new railways lacking in certain key linkages, and therefore so utterly inefficacious, that they preferred to continue transporting their goods by road.

The Cabinet Secretary of that time, then issued a surreal warning that if these businesses did not use the new railway voluntarily, they would be compelled to use it by government decree. And yet this was a railway that had been promoted as an engine of 21st century prosperity, which was going to have a transformational impact on the economy.

When this new railway was first being discussed, there were those who argued that improvements to the colonial-era “meter-gauge” railway were what the country really needed. That upgrading and modernising this old railway would be far cheaper than building a new railway and would also serve much the same purpose as any new railway might (ie reduce the numbers of trucks plying the Mombasa-Nairobi road, which were a key contributor to the tragically high levels of road accidents on that highway).

But the lure of a brand-new railway, the first such railway in 100 years, built by a democratically elected government and not the oppressive and exploitative colonial government of 100 years ago, proved irresistible. And so, we got a new railway.

 


logo© The Star 2024. All rights reserved