logo
ADVERTISEMENT

NGODE: The balancing act: Navigating corporate surveillance in modern workplace

As HR leaders, our primary responsibility is to foster a positive workplace culture where employees feel valued and trusted.

image
by CHRPK JEMIMA NGODE

Star-blogs18 April 2025 - 10:04
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • While technological advancements have streamlined operations and enhanced productivity, they have also introduced a contentious issue: corporate surveillance.
  • This phenomenon, once relegated to the realm of science fiction, is now a reality that demands our attention and careful consideration.
Radio Africa Group human resource manager Jemima Ngode. [PHOTO: LEAH MUKANGAI]

As strategic leaders in Human Resources, we are at the forefront of a profound transformation within the workplace.

While technological advancements have streamlined operations and enhanced productivity, they have also introduced a contentious issue: corporate surveillance.

This phenomenon, once relegated to the realm of science fiction, is now a reality that demands our attention and careful consideration.

In recent years, companies have increasingly turned to surveillance tools to monitor employee performance, ensure compliance, and safeguard company assets.

 From keystroke logging and email monitoring to video surveillance and location tracking, the methods are varied and often intrusive.

While proponents argue that these measures enhance productivity and accountability, they also raise significant ethical and legal concerns.

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this trend, with remote work becoming the norm for many organisations.

To learn more about Jemima Ngode, click here to subscribe to her YouTube channel Acing life with Jemmie

In a bid to maintain oversight, some employers have adopted invasive monitoring systems designed to track employee activity in real time. But at what cost?

As HR leaders, our primary responsibility is to foster a positive workplace culture where employees feel valued and trusted.

The implementation of surveillance tools can create a climate of fear and mistrust, undermining employee morale and engagement.

Research shows that when employees feel constantly monitored, their creativity and willingness to collaborate can diminish.

This is particularly concerning for organisations striving to innovate and adapt in a rapidly changing environment.

Moreover, the psychological impact of surveillance cannot be overstated.

Employees may experience heightened stress and anxiety, leading to burnout and turnover. Recruiting and retaining talent is already a significant challenge in today’s competitive labour market.

 Corporate surveillance could exacerbate this issue, driving away top talent who seek organisations that prioritise their well-being.

The push for transparency and fairness in the workplace has led to a growing scrutiny of surveillance practices.

Legal experts warn that companies must tread carefully, as invasive monitoring can lead to potential lawsuits and damage to the organisation's reputation.

Employees have the right to privacy, and any perceived violation can result in significant backlash, both from within the organisation and in the public sphere.

As we navigate this complex landscape, it is imperative for HR leaders to advocate for policies that respect employee privacy while still addressing legitimate business needs.

This includes establishing clear guidelines on what constitutes acceptable monitoring and ensuring employees are aware of these practices.

Transparency is key; when employees understand the rationale behind surveillance, they are more likely to accept it.

The challenge lies in finding a balance between operational efficiency and employee trust.

Instead of relying solely on surveillance, organisations can implement alternative strategies that promote accountability without infringing on privacy.

For instance, fostering open communication, setting clear performance expectations, and encouraging regular feedback can create an environment of mutual respect.

Additionally, investing in employee development and well-being can yield far greater returns than invasive monitoring.

When employees feel supported in their roles, they are more likely to engage fully and contribute to the organisation’s success.

As we look to the future, it is essential for HR leaders to take a proactive stance on corporate surveillance.

We must advocate for practices that prioritise employee dignity while meeting business objectives.

 Encouraging a culture of trust and transparency will not only enhance employee satisfaction but also drive organisational performance.

In conclusion, corporate surveillance is a double-edged sword.

As strategic leaders in HR, we have the opportunity to guide our organisations through this complex issue, ensuring that we protect both our company's interests and the well-being of our employees.

 By fostering a culture of trust, we can create a workplace where everyone feels valued, engaged, and empowered to contribute to our collective success.

Let us embrace this challenge and lead the way toward a healthier, more inclusive work environment.

CHRPK Jemima Ngode is Radio Africa Group's HR Manager. 

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT