logo
ADVERTISEMENT

NACADA: Why more university students chew muguka

A report by NACADA says muguka is cheaper and more potent, becoming popular among students.

image
by FELIX KIPKEMOI

News13 February 2025 - 10:42
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • The majority of respondents were undergraduate students from public universities (61.5 per cent), followed by those from private institutions (38.5 per cent).
  • Interestingly, the primary source of the drugs was peer influence, with 66 per cent of students citing friends as the main suppliers.

Miraa and muguka.




A new report on the state of drugs and substance use in universities has revealed a troubling increase in use of muguka and miraa by students.

According to the findings, approximately 10 per cent of students in both public and private universities are using these substances, with muguka, the cheaper and more potent variety, becoming increasingly popular.

National Authority for the Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NACADA) Director Research, Standards and Licensing John Muteti while sounding alarm, stated that more students are getting addicted to this substance.

He said they are continuously admitting them to rehabilitation centres something that is making it expensive for them.

“Mugaka is cheaper, with Sh50 you get it very quickly,” said Muteti.

In contrast, miraa, a more expensive version that includes both the leaves and stems of the plant, is mostly consumed by affluent students.

Muguka is a low-cost, highly addictive variant of khat (Catha edulis) grown in Embu, Meru and Tharaka-Nithi counties in central Kenya.

Derived from the same plant, muguka consists of the leaves while the pricier version, miraa, includes the stems and the leaves.

Apart from it being cheaper, it is also more potent and addictive and popular in the coastal counties of Mombasa, Kilifi, Taita Taveta and Kwale.

The report surveyed 15,678 respondents, with a nearly perfect response rate of 99.7 per cent.

The majority of respondents were undergraduate students from public universities (61.5 per cent), followed by those from private institutions (38.5 per cent).

Students in their first year (26.9 per cent), second year (24.3 per cent), third year (23.8 per cent), and fourth year (24.2 per cent) were represented in the study.

Interestingly, the primary source of the drugs was peer influence, with 66 per cent of students citing friends as the main suppliers.

Other sources included canteens, bars, and nearby premises (59.3 per cent), fellow students (56 per cent), and online platforms, such as websites and social media (39.4 per cent).

Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen officially launched the report.

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

logo© The Star 2024. All rights reserved