The government’s recent reform initiatives— though rooted in noble intentions—have exposed significant gaps in planning, implementation and public engagement.
The introduction of the Social Health Authority, the new Higher Education Funding Model and the Housing Fund has stirred unexpected discontent, raising the question: did we move too fast without adequately assessing the ground?
The SHA aims to provide universal healthcare, a commendable goal for a nation grappling with disparities in access to medical services.
However, it has left many citizens feeling overwhelmed by unclear policies, increased premiums, and overburdened healthcare providers.
In the education sector, the new funding model promised inclusivity and equity by categorising students into five income-based bands for financial aid.
While innovative on paper, its rushed rollout has been plagued by poor data verification processes, leaving many students misclassified and struggling to secure funding.
As we approach 2025, the government has a
crucial opportunity to regroup and recalibrate.
Instead of rushing into further reforms, it must
prioritise streamlining existing systems.
