logo
ADVERTISEMENT

Polygamy: Tradition or modern choice?

Supporters of polygamy argue that it provides individuals with a sense of security, companionship and stability.

image
by SHARON MWENDE

Realtime18 February 2025 - 13:00
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • There are two primary types of polygamy: polygyny, where a man has multiple wives, and polyandry, where a woman has multiple husbands.
  • Polygyny is the most common form and has been historically practised in various cultures around the world.

An illustration of a polygamous marriage/ AI

"I am for it," Yegon Kipkemoi said when asked if he would consider polygamy.

According to Yegon, having more than one wife gives a man a sense of royalty.

“I am encouraging polygamy, and it should be understood that such a practice depends on family background. In my case, I have been brought up in a family where I have multiple grandmothers,” he said.

“My granddad did it, so why can’t I?”

Polygamy has long been a topic of debate, with its roots deeply embedded in cultural traditions, religious practices and historical customs.

It refers to the practice of having more than one spouse at the same time.

There are two primary types of polygamy: polygyny, where a man has multiple wives, and polyandry, where a woman has multiple husbands.

Polygyny is the most common form and has been historically practised in various cultures around the world, especially in parts of Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

In some societies, it is seen as an age-old tradition that reflects family values, wealth or status.

For others, it is viewed as controversial and even outdated, particularly in the context of modern values surrounding gender equality and personal freedom.

It is, however, still being practised despite the many dissenting voices.

Supporters of polygamy argue that it provides individuals, especially women in some contexts, with a sense of security, companionship and stability.

In traditional societies where women may not have the same opportunities for economic independence, having multiple wives can ensure financial support and social security for them and their children.

In societies where it is practised, polygamy can be seen as a means of ensuring that all parties involved are supported financially and emotionally, and it can reflect a mutual agreement between consenting adults.

In some communities, it is also viewed as a way of solidifying political alliances or preserving family lineage.

On the other hand, critics of polygamy often highlight concerns over gender inequality, exploitation and the emotional and psychological impacts it can have on the individuals involved, particularly women.

Many critics argue that polygamy can perpetuate patriarchal systems where women are seen as subordinate and that it can lead to unhealthy family dynamics, jealousy and feelings of neglect.

Women in polygamous marriages often face emotional distress due to competition for their husband's attention and resources.

The practice is also seen by some as incompatible with modern values of individual autonomy and gender equality, particularly when a woman has little say in the arrangement.

Others rely on their religious knowledge.

As for Sarah Wainaina, polygamy is not Bible-oriented, so “why should I support it?”

She, however, said that as much as she would not enter into the form of marriage, she is not going to preach to others not to.

“If others are fine with it, then by all means let them do it. But a man should ask himself a couple of questions before jumping into marrying multiple women,” she said.

“Are you able to provide? Is there harmony? Such questions.”

Reiterating that marriage should be for one man and one woman, she, however, adds, “But if it is necessary, do, as long as you provide and care for all your wives.”

Jack Owino is against the practice, stating that marriage should be intimate and sacred, for one pair, not multiple women.

“I don't like it. I'm against it because marriage and intimacy are matters of the heart and are personal,” he said.

“It is not possible for one to be divided unless one is willing to erode the element of trust. In this case, love is outweighed by trust.”

As for Jimmy Wambui:

“Polygamy is a waste of time. No love can appreciate two people at a go. Love is better served in a monogamous relationship where competition is only about how to love even more.”

Related Articles


logo© The Star 2024. All rights reserved